Different from / Different than

This is a huge debate amongst linguists! The basic idea is that "different than" is historically used, and "different from" is more modern.

In my opinion, when we think about the message of the statement, we are ultimately trying to convey that two things differ. Or, one "differs from" another. Therefore, one can argue that "different from" makes more sense.

Also, we need a starting point when we compare one thing to another. We start FROM the first item, and move on to the item of comparison. Therefore, "this second pencil [differs from = is different from] that first pencil."

With that said, both phrases are acceptable today in 2026 in both spoken and written English, so you don't need to worry too much. However, if you are writing or speaking for a grade, check with your teacher/educator which grammar rule they prefer and use that for their specific assignment. Good luck!

Use different from when comparing things:

Portuguese is different from Spanish.

My schedule is different from yours.

Use different than (especially in American English) when followed by a clause:

The exam was different than I expected.

The job is different than it seemed.

“Different from” and “different than” both mean that two things are not the same. However, “different from” is the more common and widely accepted expression, especially in formal writing. “Different than” is mainly used in American English and is often followed by a complete idea or sentence. For example, you can say, “My new school is different from my old school,” or “The exam was different than I expected.” In most situations, using “different from” is the safest choice.

Most often the same....and the difference may not worth bothering a student